lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1a/7] dlm: core locking
Date
On Friday 29 April 2005 17:52, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> * Without LKM_LOCAL:
> [root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz
>
> real 0m39.699s
> user 0m3.644s
> sys 0m8.076s
>
> * With LKM_LOCAL
> [root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz
>
> real 0m22.076s
> user 0m3.869s
> sys 0m7.234s
>
> So yes, I'd say it's worth a significant amount of performance to us :)

To be precise, LKM_LOCAL saves you 44%, and even without LKM_LOCAL you turn in
a respectable number. Could you please provide your node, shared disk and
network specs?

Because I am greedy, I would like to have seen the Ext3 number, too. And oh
yes, the Ext2 number!

Regards,

Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-30 02:55    [W:0.046 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site