[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [CHECKER] Do ext2, jfs and reiserfs respect mount -o sync/dirsync option?
    On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:33:40PM -0800, Junfeng Yang wrote:
    > Hi,
    > FiSC (our file system checker) emits several warnings on ext2, jfs and
    > reiserfs, complaining that diretories or files are lost while FiSC
    > believes they should already be persistent on disk. (ext3 behaves
    > correctly.)
    > All warnings boil down to a single cause: when these file systems are
    > mounted -o sync or dirsync, dirty blocks are still written out
    > asynchronously. It appears to me that these mount options don't have any
    > effect on these file systems. Is this the intended behavior?

    I don't believe so. The sync option should definitionally make calls
    to fsync for integrity redundant. This probably got broken ages ago
    for ext2 in one of the many buffer/page cache refactorings.

    Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.028 / U:122.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site