[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [MC] [CHECKER] Do ext2, jfs and reiserfs respect mount -o sync/dirsync option?
    On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Junfeng Yang wrote:

    > Hi,
    > FiSC (our file system checker) emits several warnings on ext2, jfs and
    > reiserfs, complaining that diretories or files are lost while FiSC
    > believes they should already be persistent on disk. (ext3 behaves
    > correctly.)

    I forget to mention, we are mainly looking for crash-recovery bugs. The
    warnings can trigger this way:
    1. do several file system operations
    2. "crash" the test machine
    3. get the crashed disk image, run fsck to recover
    4. mount the recovered disk image

    I'm able to reproduce the same warnings on ext2 using the following

    system("sudo umount /dev/hda9");
    system("/sbin/mke2fs /dev/hda9");
    system("sudo mount -t ext2 /dev/hda9 /mnt/sbd1 -o sync,dirsync");
    creat("/mnt/sbd1/0002", 0777);
    mkdir("/mnt/sbd1/0003", 0777);
    // unplug your power cord here :) then use e2fsck to recover

    uname -a shows
    Linux notus 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Nov 25 04:34:30 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.025 / U:31.784 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site