lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory

* Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@cpushare.com> wrote:

> > technical comment: seccomp goes outside the audit/selinux framework,
> > which i believe is a bug. Andrea?
>
> I intentionally left it out of audit/selinux. To the less dependencies
> it has on other parts of the kernel and the simpler it is, the better
> IMHO. Seccomp should be fixed in stone, people shouldn't go hack on it
> every day.

let me put it another way: this is a security hole. seccomp is now a way
to evade the auditing of read/write syscalls done to an opened file.
Please fix this.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.448 / U:1.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site