[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Bcm43xx-dev] Broadcom 43xx first results

    > Wouldn't it be better to try to get that functionality added into the
    > net/ieee80211 code instead of maintaining separate extension outside the
    > kernel tree? Many modern cards need the ability for the host CPU to take
    > care of management frame sending and receiving and from my view point,
    > this code should be in net/ieee80211. Many (all?) of the functions in
    > this "SoftMAC" look like something that would be nice to have as an
    > option in net/ieee80211. In other words, the low-level driver would
    > indicate what kind of functionality it needs and ieee80211 stack would
    > behave differently based on the underlying hardware profile.

    It would certainly be a good idea and I'm sure that's what will happen
    once the code is mature enough ;)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-05 07:16    [W:0.019 / U:6.836 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site