lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] generic-hardirqs.patch, 2.6.9-rc1-bk14
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>> And make hardirq.o dependent on some symbols the architectures set.
>> Else arches that don't use it carry tons of useless baggage around
>> (and in fact I'm pretty sure it wouldn't even compie for many)

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 02:45:47PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> it compiles fine on x86, x64, ppc and ppc64. Why do you think it wont
> compile on others?
> wrt. unused generic functions - why dont we drop them link-time?

It may be time for a __weak define to abbreviate __attribute__((weak));
we seem to use it in enough places.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.765 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site