Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Sep 2004 05:57:55 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [patch] generic-hardirqs.patch, 2.6.9-rc1-bk14 |
| |
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: >> And make hardirq.o dependent on some symbols the architectures set. >> Else arches that don't use it carry tons of useless baggage around >> (and in fact I'm pretty sure it wouldn't even compie for many)
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 02:45:47PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > it compiles fine on x86, x64, ppc and ppc64. Why do you think it wont > compile on others? > wrt. unused generic functions - why dont we drop them link-time?
It may be time for a __weak define to abbreviate __attribute__((weak)); we seem to use it in enough places.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |