lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH][1/1] Per-priority statistics for CFQ w/iopriorities 2.6.8.1
Jens Axboe wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 30 2004, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
>
>>Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Missed this patch the first time over (thank you lwn :-) - why are you
>>>using atomic counters? In all the paths you set them, you already have
>>>the queue lock.
>>>
>>
>>Thats right, there's no need for them. I used these instinctively....
>>Will fix in next version, unless (hint, hint) you're taking a look at
>>adding priorities back to mainline's CFQ.
>
>
> It will never be for the mainline cfq, that is a dead code base. -mm has
> a first stab at a cfq v2 with persistent io contexts, the priority based
> code will go on top of that.
>

Great. In CKRM, we'll switch to using -mm's cfq then.

-- Shailabh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.345 / U:0.720 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site