[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][1/1] Per-priority statistics for CFQ w/iopriorities
Jens Axboe wrote:
> Hi,
> Missed this patch the first time over (thank you lwn :-) - why are you
> using atomic counters? In all the paths you set them, you already have
> the queue lock.

Thats right, there's no need for them. I used these instinctively....
Will fix in next version, unless (hint, hint) you're taking a look at
adding priorities back to mainline's CFQ.

-- Shailabh
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.048 / U:1.024 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site