lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Posix compliant CLOCK_PROCESS/THREAD_CPUTIME_ID V4
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, George Anzinger wrote:

> > So restrict timer_create to CLOCK_REALTIME and CLOCK_MONOTONIC? Is it
> > necessary to be able to derive a timer from a timer derives from those
> > two?
> >
> > something like the following (just inlined for the discussion ...)?
>
> NO. This is handled through the dispatch table (as set up when you register the
> clock). You just supply a timer_create() function that returns the right error.
> Likewise, attempts to use clock_nanosleep(). The issue with clock_nanosleep,
> however, is that it, at this time, is not sent through the dispatch table. This
> should be changed to, again call the same error function.

Ok. I gotta look at this again.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.131 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site