Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:29:28 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: patches inline in mail |
| |
George Anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote: > > We agree. Still, I have been bitten too many times by misshandled white space > to trust pure inlineing. Likewise on picking it up one would usually past it in > the mail (I suppose) where as the attachment is through the mailer and less > prone to missing a character. > > The best answer, I think, is attachments that show as inline AND stay that way > on the reply. > > Guild lines on how to insure this are welcome.
Send angry email to everyone@mozilla.org. AFAICT it's impossible with recent mailnews.
Slightly more on-topic:
+int do_posix_clock_process_gettime(struct timespec *tp); +int do_posix_clock_process_settime(struct timespec *tp); +int do_posix_clock_thread_gettime(struct timespec *tp); +int do_posix_clock_thread_settime(struct timespec *tp);
These should all be given static scope.
And it would be nice to structure the code so the forward decl isn't needed, if poss.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |