[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others)
    --- Ingo Molnar <> wrote:

    > could you also try the 2.6.8-rc4-mm1 kernel? It has the array-switch
    > disabled which _could_ lead to smoother timeslice distribution. It still
    > has wakeup bonuses though.
    > Ingo

    Sorry I didn't have the chance to try this test before: I didn't try it on as I saw that maybe the patch related to the array sawitching was

    Anyway, I tried the test on 2.6.8-rc4-mm1 and it fails the test with 2 and 20
    threads (delays of about 3 seconds for 2 threads, and 5 seconds with 20).


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.022 / U:48.844 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site