lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others)
    --- Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

    >
    > could you also try the 2.6.8-rc4-mm1 kernel? It has the array-switch
    > disabled which _could_ lead to smoother timeslice distribution. It still
    > has wakeup bonuses though.
    >
    > Ingo

    Sorry I didn't have the chance to try this test before: I didn't try it on
    2.6.8.1-mm1 as I saw that maybe the patch related to the array sawitching was
    dropped.

    Anyway, I tried the test on 2.6.8-rc4-mm1 and it fails the test with 2 and 20
    threads (delays of about 3 seconds for 2 threads, and 5 seconds with 20).

    Nicolas

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.020 / U:29.436 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site