Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: [cgl_discussion] Re: [dcl_discussion] Clustersummit materials | From | Steven Dake <> | Date | Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:42:16 -0700 |
| |
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 02:57, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2004-08-11T11:46:03, > Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com> said: > > > If we can't live with the cluster services in userland (although I'm > > still not convinced), then atleast the group messaging protocol in the > > kernel could be based upon 20 years of research in group messaging and > > work properly under _all_ fault scenarios. > > Right. Another important alternative maybe the Transis group > communication suite, which has been released as GPL/LGPL now. > > This all just highlights that we need to think about communication some > more before we can tackle it sensibly, but of course I'll be glad if > someone proves me wrong and Just Does It ;-) >
agreed... Transis in kernel would be a fine alternative to openais gmi in kernel.
Speaking of transis, is the code posted anywhere? I'd like to have a look.
Thanks -steve > > Sincerely, > Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |