[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Linux-cluster] Re: [cgl_discussion] Re: [dcl_discussion] Clustersummit materials
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 13:37, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2004-08-12T10:42:16,
> Steven Dake <> said:
> > agreed... Transis in kernel would be a fine alternative to openais gmi
> > in kernel.
> >
> > Speaking of transis, is the code posted anywhere? I'd like to have a
> > look.
> It's not yet at the final location, but we put up what we got at
> .

Thanks for posting transis. I had a look at the examples and API. The
API is of course different then openais and focused on client/server

I tried a performance test by sending a 64k message, and then receiving
it 10 times with two nodes. This operation takes about 5 seconds on my
hardware which is 128k/sec. I was expecting more like 8-10MB/sec. Is
there anything that can be done to improve the performance?


Certainly a different sort of API then openais...

> Sincerely,
> Lars Marowsky-Brée <>

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.088 / U:5.304 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site