[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Bug zapper? :)
Hash: SHA1

V13 wrote:
| On Monday 09 August 2004 23:07, John Richard Moser wrote:
|>What I found interesting was that it described bugs as
|>pseudo-quantitative based on the KLOC (thousands of lines of code) for a
|>code body. The basic theory boils down to 5-50 bugs per 1000 LOC,
|>approaching 5 for QA audited code. Thus, 10000 LOC executable, 50 bugs.
| I believe that you should not believe such things. They are just
| and nothing more.

Statistics are as a whole, not as a part. This makes statistics a
powerful art.

| If you have a 1000 lines project and:
| a) Remove all empty lines means that you remove bugs?
| b) Split it to 5 libraries and 5 utilities (10 projects) means that
| have less bugs?
| c) ....
| I don't take generalizations like this seriously and I believe that noone
| should do. It may be true that 10.000 lines of code contain 50 bugs as an
| average of all the code that has be written so far but it doesn't mean
| a) 50 bugs require 10.000 lines
| b) 50 bugs will always exist on 10.000 lines
| c) All the projects out there have the same number of bugs/line

No, but it means in a sample of one hundred and twenty eight billion
lines, there will be approximately fifty bugs per 10000 lines of code.

| <<V13>>

- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.

Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.050 / U:6.876 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site