[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: preempt-timing-2.6.8-rc1
    William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    > William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    >>>AFAICT this is nothing more than rounding up.
    > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:57:54PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
    >>But you want to round down by definition of preempt_thresh, don't you?
    >>preempt_thresh = 1ms = 1000000us
    >>ie. warn me if the lock hold goes _to or above_ 1000000us
    > The semantics I implemented are warning for strictly above the
    > preempt_thresh. Whether those semantics are ideal is irrelevant; it's
    > faithful to those semantics.

    You are right - I misread it, sorry.

    > Given that people are asking for sub-
    > millisecond latencies, maybe I should increase the precision.

    Would soon be useful I think.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.029 / U:6.620 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site