lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: preempt-timing-2.6.8-rc1
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> The semantics I implemented are warning for strictly above the
>> preempt_thresh. Whether those semantics are ideal is irrelevant; it's
>> faithful to those semantics.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:10:09PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> You are right - I misread it, sorry.

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Given that people are asking for sub-
>> millisecond latencies, maybe I should increase the precision.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:10:09PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Would soon be useful I think.

Let me spin up the CONFIG_PREEMPT=n fix and then I'll move on that.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.512 / U:2.212 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site