Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:07:26 +1000 | From | Paul Mackerras <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] PPC64: lockfix for rtas error log |
| |
Linas,
> Too many kernel trees. Someone must have whacked the ameslab tree > by accident, or on purpose, because they got sick of seeing rtas > messages. I don't find the RTAS messages to be pleasent, but simply > whacking them is not the right solution. The following diff is > between an older tree and the current tree. If you could re-add > these lines, that would be great.
As far as I can see, the ameslab tree has _never_ contained those lines. The last change to chrp_setup.c was on 1 May 2004, and neither that version nor any of the earlier versions that I looked at have those lines. Are you sure you don't have that as a local change in your copy? Do a bk sfiles -i and a bk push -n and see if it shows up.
In any case the #ifdef is redundant, because chrp_setup.o is only linked in if CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES is set.
As for the RTAS messages being printk'd, the only possible justification would be if there was a userspace tool to analyse them. I don't know if such a thing exists, and if it does, I certainly don't have a copy. Is anyone working on that?
Paul. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |