Messages in this thread | | | From | "Chen, Kenneth W" <> | Subject | RE: [RFC] [PATCH] Performance of del_timer_sync | Date | Tue, 11 May 2004 14:01:21 -0700 |
| |
>>>> Ingo Molnar wrote on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:57 PM > * Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote: > > > > > Nah, that's ungrammatical. del_timer_singleshot means "delete a timer > > > > in a single-shot manner". > > > > > > > > We have: > > > > > > > > "add a timer" > > > > "modify a timer" > > > > "delete a timer" > > > > "delete a timer synchronously" > > > > "delete a single-shot timer" > > > > > > hm, indeed. Miraculously, the existing timer API names are correct > > > grammatically, so we might as well go for del_single_shot_timer() ... > > > > > > > <anal>del_singleshot_timer_sync</anal> > > > > I vote we leave it up to Ken. But please, not del_timer_kenneth(). > > yeah. Ken's got a license to name ;)
Cool, feeling pretty good here. I'm going to stick with andrew's original name, and add a big fat comments for the new function ;-)
- Ken
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |