lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [RFC] [PATCH] Performance of del_timer_sync
Date
>>>> Ingo Molnar wrote on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:57 PM
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> > > > Nah, that's ungrammatical. del_timer_singleshot means "delete a timer
> > > > in a single-shot manner".
> > > >
> > > > We have:
> > > >
> > > > "add a timer"
> > > > "modify a timer"
> > > > "delete a timer"
> > > > "delete a timer synchronously"
> > > > "delete a single-shot timer"
> > >
> > > hm, indeed. Miraculously, the existing timer API names are correct
> > > grammatically, so we might as well go for del_single_shot_timer() ...
> > >
> >
> > <anal>del_singleshot_timer_sync</anal>
> >
> > I vote we leave it up to Ken. But please, not del_timer_kenneth().
>
> yeah. Ken's got a license to name ;)

Cool, feeling pretty good here. I'm going to stick with andrew's original
name, and add a big fat comments for the new function ;-)

- Ken


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.112 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site