Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 May 2004 13:55:38 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Performance of del_timer_sync |
| |
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > > * Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote: > > > Nah, that's ungrammatical. del_timer_singleshot means "delete a timer > > in a single-shot manner". > > > > We have: > > > > "add a timer" > > "modify a timer" > > "delete a timer" > > "delete a timer synchronously" > > "delete a single-shot timer" > > hm, indeed. Miraculously, the existing timer API names are correct > grammatically, so we might as well go for del_single_shot_timer() ... >
<anal>del_singleshot_timer_sync</anal>
I vote we leave it up to Ken. But please, not del_timer_kenneth().
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |