[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: dynamic-hz

> > > > But that does not matter, right? Yes, one-shot timer will not fire
> > > > exactly at right place, but as long as you are reading TSC and basing
> > > > next shot on current time, error should not accumulate.
> > >
> > > As said in the rest of the message, the error (or some other error)
> > > accumulates heavily today in the tick-loss compensation/adjustment
> > > algorithm in arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c, so I'm sceptical
> > > about
> >
> > I do not see how it should accumulate. Lets have working TSC. You want
> > to emulate fixed-period timer with single-shot timer.
> Its caused by the fact that we don't use the the TSC to accumulate time.
> We are instead interpolating between timer ticks and the TSC, where

Yes, it was supposed to be simple, so that Andrea understands that
there's nothing inherently broken with single-shot timers.

People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.129 / U:4.196 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site