lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subjectext3 reservation strangeness?!
Date
When copying a file on 2.6.9-mm1 with the ext3 reservation code,
I noticed that there were a lot of fragments. Doing the same when
the filesystem is mounted with 'noreservation' seems to produce
better results?! Or am I interpreting this incorrectly?

Example:

[root@kvo kvo]# ls -l t
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8228490 Oct 23 14:45 t

Copying this file with reservation code active:

[root@kvo kvo]# mount -t ext3 -o commit=60,reservation /dev/sda1 /mnt
[root@kvo kvo]# cp t /mnt
[root@kvo kvo]# filefrag /mnt/t
/mnt/t: 129 extents found, perfection would be 1 extent
[root@kvo kvo]# rm -f /mnt/t
[root@kvo kvo]# umount /mnt

While doing the same with 'noreservation' produces only 2 extents:

[root@kvo kvo]# mount -t ext3 -o commit=60,noreservation /dev/sda1 /mnt
[root@kvo kvo]# cp t /mnt
[root@kvo kvo]# filefrag /mnt/t
/mnt/t: 2 extents found, perfection would be 1 extent
[root@kvo kvo]# rm -f /mnt/t


There was enough free diskspace available:

[root@kvo kvo]# df /mnt
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 76904352 25383252 47614496 35% /mnt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.026 / U:0.772 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site