lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8
From
Date
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 11:06, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:59:28AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 22 2004, Bill Huey wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 08:19:01AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > It has to go, why? Because your deadlock detection breaks? Doesn't seem
> > > > a very strong reason to me at all, sorry.
> > >
> > > The deadlock detector is needed. Whether you understand that or not is
> > > irrelevant to the current work that's being done. And your idiot attacks
> > > against it doesn't correct these issues nor does it gain credibility
> > > with the audience that does find it useful.
> >
> > *plonk*
> >
> > If you can't stand criticism without resorting to feeble personal
> > attacks, I suggest you go elsewhere.
>
> Then stick to the topic at hand, suggest positive changes, and cut the
> crap with implied personal attacks like the above. If you hadn't pull
> the discussion to that point, I wouldn't have reacted that way. It's
> completely juvenile behavior from you and you can't expect me or
> anybody else to take it sitting down.

Stop that now !

You have started personal attacks.

This flame was already off. What the heck are you trying to achieve with
this ?

tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:1.243 / U:0.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site