Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8 | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Date | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:23:44 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 11:06, Bill Huey wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:59:28AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 22 2004, Bill Huey wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 08:19:01AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > It has to go, why? Because your deadlock detection breaks? Doesn't seem > > > > a very strong reason to me at all, sorry. > > > > > > The deadlock detector is needed. Whether you understand that or not is > > > irrelevant to the current work that's being done. And your idiot attacks > > > against it doesn't correct these issues nor does it gain credibility > > > with the audience that does find it useful. > > > > *plonk* > > > > If you can't stand criticism without resorting to feeble personal > > attacks, I suggest you go elsewhere. > > Then stick to the topic at hand, suggest positive changes, and cut the > crap with implied personal attacks like the above. If you hadn't pull > the discussion to that point, I wouldn't have reacted that way. It's > completely juvenile behavior from you and you can't expect me or > anybody else to take it sitting down.
Stop that now !
You have started personal attacks.
This flame was already off. What the heck are you trying to achieve with this ?
tglx
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |