[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:59:28AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22 2004, Bill Huey wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 08:19:01AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > It has to go, why? Because your deadlock detection breaks? Doesn't seem
> > > a very strong reason to me at all, sorry.
> >
> > The deadlock detector is needed. Whether you understand that or not is
> > irrelevant to the current work that's being done. And your idiot attacks
> > against it doesn't correct these issues nor does it gain credibility
> > with the audience that does find it useful.
> *plonk*
> If you can't stand criticism without resorting to feeble personal
> attacks, I suggest you go elsewhere.

Then stick to the topic at hand, suggest positive changes, and cut the
crap with implied personal attacks like the above. If you hadn't pull
the discussion to that point, I wouldn't have reacted that way. It's
completely juvenile behavior from you and you can't expect me or
anybody else to take it sitting down.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:2.006 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site