Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:54:01 +1000 | Subject | Re: tun.c patch to fix "smp_processor_id() in preemptible code" | From | Herbert Xu <> |
| |
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:51:17PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > Ok, here is the correct patch. If this is really just a matter of > performance, and not required for correctness, disabling preemption is > broken, right?
No if you're doing this then you should get rid of netif_rx_ni() altogether. But before you do that please ask all the people who call it. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |