lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Fw: Performance drop 2.6.0-test7 -> 2.6.1-rc2
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
: On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:54:27AM +0100, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
: > I have done further testing:
: >
: > - this is reliable: repeated boot back to 2.6.1-rc2 makes the problem
: > appear again (high load, system slow has hell), booting back
: > to -test7 makes it disappear.
:
: Can you put fs/xfs from -test7 into the 2.6.1-rc tree and test with that?

I did that. Under 2.6.1-rc2 wit 2.6.0-test7 fs/xfs subtree the load
went up to >40 two minutes after boot. So it is not XFS related.

I have also ran hdparm -t (under a load, though) on all of my
physical disks, and the numbers on 2.6.1-rc2 seems to be more-or-less
the same as under 2.6.0-test7.

Now I will try to boot 2.6.0-test9 and we will see if it is
similar to -rc2 or not.

-Y.

--
| Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> |
| GPG: ID 1024/D3498839 Fingerprint 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E |
| http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/ Czech Linux Homepage: http://www.linux.cz/ |
| I actually have a lot of admiration and respect for the PATA knowledge |
| embedded in drivers/ide. But I would never call it pretty:) -Jeff Garzik |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.070 / U:0.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site