lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH, 1/4] readX_check() performance evaluation
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 20:39:15 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> said:

>> Yet they are a good indicator that something is wrong (not performing
>> properly) or may be failing soon. I don't think putting on blinders
>> for such problems is a good idea. Though I agree that the question of

Andi> Most server class hardware should log it somewhere and allow
Andi> to read the event log in the firmware. This even works for
Andi> unhandleable errors unlike what the OS could do.

And you'd want to reboot your server just so you can check on the soft
failure rate? ;-)

--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.778 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site