[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH, 1/4] readX_check() performance evaluation
    >>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:01:32 +0100, Andi Kleen <> said:

    Andi> Seriously you can count it somewhere and present it in sysfs
    Andi> or /proc. Or log it somewhere else and supply a special
    Andi> utility to show them that makes it clear that the events are
    Andi> hardware and not software related. I suppose if your server
    Andi> vendor is serious they will supply a tool to read the firmware
    Andi> log from a running system.

    Andi> But printks enabled by default are a bad idea (and a bug too
    Andi> BTW - printk called from MCE handlers can randomly deadlock)

    No argument here. I didn't get/see the earlier part of this
    discussion so I didn't realize you were complaining about printks
    only. Never mind.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.025 / U:1.140 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site