[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Efficient IPC mechanism on Linux
    On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:52:55AM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
    > Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > > > The overhead implied by a memcpy() is the same, in the oder of magnitude,
    > > > ***whatever*** kernel version you can develop.
    > >
    > > yes a copy of a page is about 3000 to 4000 cycles on an x86 box in the
    > > uncached case. A pagetable operation (like the cpu setting the accessed
    > > or dirty bit) is in that same order I suspect (maybe half this, but not
    > > a lot less). Changing pagetable content is even more because all the
    > > tlb's and internal cpu state will need to be flushed... which is also a
    > > microcode operation for the cpu. And it's deadly in an SMP environment.
    > I have just done a measurement on a 366MHz PII Celeron

    This test is sort of the worst case against my argument:
    1) It's a cpu with low memory bandwidth
    2) It's a 1 CPU system
    3) It's a pII not pIV; the pII is way more efficient cycle wise
    for pagetable operations

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.018 / U:23.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site