Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:08:18 -0700 | From | Larry McVoy <> | Subject | Inappropriate signatures |
| |
Dear Andrea,
We're providing the service which enables all of the below and without our good will that service is at risk. You're publicly slamming the providers of that service.
If you want to do that, that's your right, but that leads us to ask:
- wasn't the deal that we do the gateway and you stop whining? - why should we provide this gateway service at all if there is whining? - why shouldn't we firewall you off since you are whining? - or if firewalling fails, put in a day or two delay in the gateway?
> /* > * If you refuse to depend on closed software for a critical > * part of your business, these links may be useful: > * > * rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.5/ > * rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.4/ > * http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/ > * > * svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.6/trunk > * svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.4/trunk > */ -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |