Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:00:09 -0700 | From | Randolph Bentson <> | Subject | Re: FS: hardlinks on directories |
| |
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 12:32:10AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > And in just the same way fs could provide a mode bit saying "hi, I am a > hardlink", and tar can then easily provide option number 1345 saying > "stay away from hardlinks".
Perhaps not a bit, but rather another enumerated value in the type field of an inode. (Are there any values left?)
Ok, lets consider this. Suppose that /a/b and /a/c both refer to the same directory, where /a/b is a traditional link, but /a/c is a "hardlink".
What happens when one executes 'rmdir /a/b'? Does the directory it references disappear? If not, how would tar ever find it? (I have this vision of a disk full of these hardlink-only directories which tar and perhaps fsck cannot find.)
-- Randolph Bentson bentson@holmsjoen.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |