Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:31:55 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cryptoloop |
| |
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:25:59PM +0200, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > They are used much more frequently than cryptoapi is. > People tell me jari-loop is much faster at present. > If this is true, your move would not be very popular.
Personally I care far less about one cryptoloop implementation beeing faster than another one, but about proper design of whatever gets into mainline. Think about this like the freeswan vs kernel ipsec thing - of course klips had more feature and more mature code initially (and maybe still has in some areas) but the kernel ipsec is the much better design.
I'd be very interested in seeing some backing and explanation of his claims so we can incorporate it into the generic cryptoapi / loop code.
The only thing I could imagine is that he has assembly implementations of many ciphers that are faster than the C ones in cryptoapi - something that's on the cryptoapi todo list anyway.
> Anyway, I am not doing a redesign. Just a cleanup.
Umm, no. You add a feature. That's something very different from a cleanup.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |