[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix do_div() for all architectures
    On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 09:31:45PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
    > Just to open some interesting speculation, do you think we'd
    > get better code by just getting rid of __attribute__((pure))
    > or by changing __do_div64() to do something like this?
    > typedef struct { uint64_t quot, uint32_t rem } __quotrem64;
    > __quotrem64 __do_div64(uint64_t div, uint32_t base) __attribute__((const));

    No. Most targets require structures be returned in memory.

    If people really care beyond the generic, they'll write
    special assembly for it.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.020 / U:6.128 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site