[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] make cramfs look less hostile
On Sun, 15 June 2003 18:26:42 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:05:24PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> >
> > This thing has been biting me now and again. "cramfs: wrong magic\n"
> > looks like an error condition to most people and thus creates bug
> > reports. But there is no bug per se in having cramfs support in the
> > kernel and booting from a jffs2 rootfs. So instead of teaching the
> > users over and over, how about this little one-liner?
> Umm, cramfs_fill_super has a silent parameter that's true for
> probing the root filesystem. I'd suggest disabling the printk
> completly if it's set.

Good idea, but only at first glance. cramfs_fill_super() always gets
called with silent=1. So if "(!silent) printk(...);" is functionally
equivalent to ";".


The competent programmer is fully aware of the strictly limited size of
his own skull; therefore he approaches the programming task in full
humility, and among other things he avoids clever tricks like the plague.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.049 / U:0.316 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site