lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)
From
>
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
>>
>> EFLAGS: 00010282
>> eax: f6c0f080 ebx: 0000416d ecx: 00010282 edx: f6c0f0f8
>> esi: c040b078 edi: f6c0f0f8 ebp: f6dd1dbc esp: f6dd1db4
>> ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
>>
>> 3c0: b9 06 00 00 00 mov $0x6,%ecx
>> ... not important ...
>> 3cc: 89 d7 mov %edx,%edi
>> 3ce: 89 55 f4 mov %edx,0xfffffff4(%ebp) 3d1:
>> f3 a5 repz movsl %ds:(%esi),%es:(%edi) 3d3: 8d
>> 50 78 lea 0x78(%eax),%edx
>> 3d6: 8b 4d f4 mov 0xfffffff4(%ebp),%ecx 3d9:
>> 89 51 18 mov %edx,0x18(%ecx) ## OOPS ##
>>
>> So %ecx should be %edi-24 = f6c0f0e0, instead it's EFLAGS. Oops [indeed].
>> %ebp value is correct, I checked. So it seems a hardware, strong radiation
>> or an interrupt that didn't restore ecx.
>
> Actually the "interrupt" did a pushfl and overwrote 0xfffffff4(%ebp). esp =
> 0xfffffff4(%ebp). For kernel code the compiler shouldn't have generated the
> above code.
>
> Szaka

Hi Szaka,

Should I just close this bugzilla entry as invalid or not an NTFS problem?
I don't mind doing that.

Thanks,
~Randy



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.136 / U:4.268 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site