Messages in this thread | | | From | David Lang <> | Date | Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:27:43 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call |
| |
this implies that when the new chip is released it may be up to 2.5GHz instead of the 1.8GHz previously listed.
Ok, this means that a year or so from now when the chip is released it will have clock speeds in the range of todays x86 chips. this is at least in the ballpark to remain competitive.
David Lang
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:51:49 -0800 > From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org> > To: Arador <diegocg@teleline.es> > Cc: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>, degger@fhm.edu, > ecki@calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:48:26PM +0100, Arador wrote: > > > I suppose eveybody has seen this... (today on slashdot ;): > > http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/27/2227257&mode=thread&tid=136 > > In a lab... who cares. > > I would guess the P4s or whatever are at 5GHz+ in Intel's labs. > > > --cw > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |