[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: DevFS vs. udev
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 20:52, Ian Kent wrote:

> It certainly seems like a good project for a someone, such as myself, that
> is new to kernel development.

Please take no offense to this, but it is an awful project for someone
new to kernel development. Plenty of knowledgeable/semi-knowledgeable
kernel hackers looked at devfs and given up on it. Despite what some
people say about Richard, he is a good guy, and he did not succeed

devfs is hard to get right and, worse, you will be starting with a bad
base of code that I would not want to touch with an 18.72 foot pole.

Greg, via udev, has made it so easy to just back up, slowly, and walk
away from devfs. devfs is not going anywhere in 2.6, I do not think,
but let sleeping piles of crap sleep and let's just jettison this thing
as soon as we can.

Just my two cents - I am warning you ;)

Rob Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean