Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Oct 2003 17:54:04 +0100 | From | Hugo Mills <> | Subject | Re: devfs vs. udev |
| |
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:06:53PM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 14:26:07 +0000, Robert L. Harris wrote: > > I just hope udev can give a look/feel similar to devfs as I have quite a > > few machines already in production configured for devfs and really like > > the manageablility.
Seconded.
> I wonder: do you use the /dev/disc/* links, or the /dev/ide/... and > /dev/scsi/... constructs?
I use /dev/scsi/ and /dev/ide/, because things tend to move around less than with /dev/discs/.
> I'm not sure how udev will be able to support both layouts.
Surely udev needs the ability to make more than one device node or symlink when a device is plugged in anyway, so I just see this as an issue of writing the appropriate default configuration files.
Hugo.
-- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 1C335860 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- This year, I'm giving up Lent. --- [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |