Messages in this thread | | | From | (Måns Rullgård) | Subject | Re: devfs vs. udev | Date | Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:11:49 +0200 |
| |
Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de> writes:
>> I just hope udev can give a look/feel similar to devfs as I have quite a >> few machines already in production configured for devfs and really like >> the manageablility. > > I wonder: do you use the /dev/disc/* links, or the /dev/ide/... and > /dev/scsi/... constructs? I'm not sure how udev will be able to > support both layouts. > > Also: do you prefer a devs compatible layout, or maybe use the change > for a cleanup? a short list of obscurities: /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 but > /dev/printers/0 and /dev/tts/0 and /dev/floppy but /dev/discs etc. also > all floppy devices are in /dev/floopy, where each disc has is > /dev/discs/discN directory/symlink. I think it's a good opportunity > for a cleanup, but that wouldn't be compatible...
I'm all for a cleanup. Changing things don't bother me, I just want a good reason.
-- Måns Rullgård mru@users.sf.net
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |