[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [ACPI] RE: kacpidpc needs to die
> From: Grover, Andrew 
> > From: Pavel Machek []
> > For reasons discussed before [forking from timer is not
> safe, anyway],
> > kacpidpc needs to die. Andrew, are you going to kill it or
> should I do
> > it?
> I can kill it...let me just verify with you --
> acpi_os_queue_for_execution has a two block switch statement, just use
> the first block (the case that uses schedule_work) and delete
> the rest,
> yes?

Oops, and combine acpi_os_schedule_exec and acpi_os_queue_exec, so that
we call dpc->function() from the original thread. Anything else?

-- Andy

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.040 / U:0.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site