Messages in this thread | | | From | "Guo, Min" <> | Subject | RE: [Pcihpd-discuss] How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs? | Date | Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:31:24 +0800 |
| |
I think it is a good idea....
Guo Min The content of this email message solely contains my own personal views, and not those of my employer.
-----Original Message----- From: stanley.wang@linux.co.intel.com [mailto:stanley.wang@linux.co.intel.com] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 5:22 PM To: Greg KH Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; PCI_Hot_Plug_Discuss Subject: [Pcihpd-discuss] How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?
Hi, Greg! After reading the pci_hotplug_core.c, I found there are many codes that are used to implement the pcihpfs. And how about using sysfs instead of pcihpfs ? I think it could make the pci_hotplug_core.c smaller. Another pro is that we will nerver be bothered by the pcihpfs' bug. How you think about it?
Regards, Stanley Wang
-- Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent Intel Corporation
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ Pcihpd-discuss mailing list Pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pcihpd-discuss - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |