[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [Pcihpd-discuss] How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?
I think it is a good idea....

Guo Min
The content of this email message solely contains my own personal views,
and not those of my employer.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Greg KH
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; PCI_Hot_Plug_Discuss
Subject: [Pcihpd-discuss] How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?

Hi, Greg!
After reading the pci_hotplug_core.c, I found there are many codes
that are used to implement the pcihpfs. And how about using sysfs instead
of pcihpfs ? I think it could make the pci_hotplug_core.c smaller. Another
pro is that we will nerver be bothered by the pcihpfs' bug.
How you think about it?

Stanley Wang

Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent Intel

This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
Pcihpd-discuss mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.040 / U:6.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site