Messages in this thread | | | From | "Protasevich, Natalie" <> | Subject | RE: APIC version | Date | Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:55:00 -0600 |
| |
The thing is, this array never gets filled with correct values for XAPICs in case when we go through ACPI, not MP. I only care about it because that is how I used to distinguish Cascades from Fosters on ES7000 (which I need to do very early, before I get to APIC mode setup).
On the other hand, I just noticed that I could go with smp_num_siblings for this purpose... so if this issue is too shady as of now, i will survive, I guess...:)
--Natalie
-----Original Message----- From: Martin J. Bligh [mailto:mbligh@aracnet.com] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:26 PM To: Nakajima, Jun; Protasevich, Natalie; Pallipadi, Venkatesh Cc: William Lee Irwin III; Christoph Hellwig; James Cleverdon; Linux Kernel Subject: RE: APIC version
> The entries in acpi_version[] are indexed by the APIC id, not smp_processor_id(). So you can overwrite acpi_version[] for a different processor.
>> + apic_version[smp_processor_id()] =
Ugh.
It's indexed by the apic ID, not the cpu id. They're not 1-1.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |