lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: APIC version
Date

The thing is, this array never gets filled with correct values for XAPICs in
case when we go through ACPI, not MP.
I only care about it because that is how I used to distinguish Cascades from
Fosters on ES7000 (which I need to do very early, before I get to APIC mode
setup).

On the other hand, I just noticed that I could go with smp_num_siblings for
this purpose... so if this issue is too shady as of now, i will survive, I
guess...:)

--Natalie


-----Original Message-----
From: Martin J. Bligh [mailto:mbligh@aracnet.com]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:26 PM
To: Nakajima, Jun; Protasevich, Natalie; Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Cc: William Lee Irwin III; Christoph Hellwig; James Cleverdon; Linux
Kernel
Subject: RE: APIC version


> The entries in acpi_version[] are indexed by the APIC id, not
smp_processor_id(). So you can overwrite acpi_version[] for a different
processor.

>> + apic_version[smp_processor_id()] =

Ugh.

It's indexed by the apic ID, not the cpu id. They're not 1-1.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.022 / U:40.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site