lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000
From
   From: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:52:15 -0700

So if apache were using a listen()/clone()/accept()/exec() combo rather than a
full listen()/fork()/exec() model it would see most of the same benefits?

Apache would need to do some more, such as do something about
cpu affinity and do the non-blocking VFS tricks Tux does too.

To be honest, I'm not going to sit here all day long and explain how
Tux works. I'm not even too knowledgable about the precise details of
it's implementation. Besides, the code is freely available and not
too complex, so you can go have a look for yourself :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.229 / U:0.864 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site