Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:58:04 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:57:39 -0700
Out of curiosity, and primarily for my own edification, what kind of optimization does it do when everything is generated by a java/ perl/python/homebrew script and pasted together by something which consults a content manager. In a few of the cases that I know of, there isn't really any static content to cache... And why is this something that Apache couldn't/shouldn't be doing?
The kernel exec's the CGI process from the TUX server and pipes the output directly into a networking socket.
Because it is cheaper to create a new fresh user thread from within the kernel (ie. we don't have to fork() apache and thus dup it's address space), it is faster. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |