Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Sep 2002 00:51:39 -0700 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: 2.5.39-mm1 |
| |
> I must say that based on a small amount of performance testing the > benefits of the cache warmness thing are disappointing. Maybe 1% if > you squint. Martin, could you please do a before-and-after on the > NUMAQ's, double check that it is actually doing the right thing?
Seems to work just fine:
2.5.38-mm1 + my original hot/cold code. Elapsed: 19.798s User: 191.61s System: 43.322s CPU: 1186.4%
2.5.39-mm1 Elapsed: 19.532s User: 192.25s System: 42.642s CPU: 1203.2%
And it's a lot more than 1% for me ;-) About 12% of systime on kernel compile, IIRC.
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |