Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:24:54 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: 2.5.39-mm1 |
| |
"Martin J. Bligh" wrote: > > Which looks about the same to me? Me slightly confused.
I expect that with the node-local allocations you're not getting a lot of benefit from the lock amortisation. Anton will.
It's the lack of improvement of cache-niceness which is irksome. Perhaps the heuristic should be based on recency-of-allocation and not recency-of-freeing. I'll play with that.
> Will try > adding the original hot/cold stuff onto 39-mm1 if you like?
Well, it's all in the noise floor, isn't it? Better off trying broader tests. I had a play with netperf and the chatroom benchmark. But the latter varied from 80,000 msgs/sec up to 350,000 between runs. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |