Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Sep 2002 20:23:20 -0300 (BRT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 |
| |
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Peter Waechtler wrote:
> With Scheduler Activations this could also be avoided. The thread > scheduler could get an upcall - but this will stay theory for a long > time on Linux. But this is a somewhat far fetched example (for arguing > for 1:1), isn't it?
Actually, the upcalls in a N:M scheme with scheduler activations seem like a pretty good argument for 1:1 to me ;)
Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |