lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited

> This is hard to setup, and has the some weaknesses:
> 1. You worry only about apps you _know_. But the guy who got
> his netscape or make -j killed will rename his
> copies of these apps to something else so your carefully
> set up oom killer won't know what is running.
> (How much memory is the "mybrowser" app supposed to use?)
> Or he'll get another software package that you haven't heard of.
>
> 2. Lots and lots of people running netscapes using
> only 70M each will still be too much. Think of
> a university with xterms and then they all
> goes to cnn.com or something for the latest news
> about some large event.
>
> Even nice well-behaved apps
> is bad when there is unusually many of them. [...]

That's obvious. The point is that the sysadmin should be
able to hint the oom killer as much as possible.
The current linux/mm/oom_kill.c:badness() takes into account
many factors. The sysadmin should be able to affect the
badness calculation on process/user/something basis.



Bye.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.075 / U:1.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site