Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Aug 2002 21:26:24 -0300 (BRT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [patch] adjustments to dirty memory thresholds |
| |
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> But sigh. Pointlessly scanning zillions of dirty pages and doing > nothing with them is dumb. So much better to go for a FIFO snooze on a > per-zone waitqueue, be woken when some memory has been cleansed.
But not per-zone, since many (most?) allocations can be satisfied from multiple zones. Guess what 2.4-rmap has had for ages ?
Interested in a port for 2.5 on top of 2.5.32-mm2 ? ;)
[I'll mercilessly increase your patch queue since it doesn't show any sign of ever shrinking anyway]
cheers,
Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |