Messages in this thread | | | From | Bernd Eckenfels <> | Subject | Re: BKL removal | Date | Mon, 8 Jul 2002 02:56:22 +0200 |
| |
In article <20020707222417.GC18298@kroah.com> you wrote: > Either way, you get my same response, "Why?" Again, as someone stated, > where in the USB code is the BKL used that affects performance in any > real life situations?
AFAIK the BKL in a not often used path can still be hold too long and affect latecy. I think the most recent low latency patches find a few instances. I am not completly shure if that is only about interrupts, or if it applies to the BKL, too.
Greetings Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |