lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [patch] i386 "General Options" - begone [take 2]
Date
> From: Dave Jones [mailto:davej@suse.de] 
> > > Can you confirm that you're not advocating a "ACPI or Legacy"
> > > approach ?
> > > I think you're aware of the dragons that lie that way, but I
> > > want to be sure my suspicions are unfounded.
> > All I can say is using just *part* of ACPI will cause some machine,
> > somewhere, to not work. I want to avoid scenarios where
> that happens. If
> > there are issues with that, can we discuss them asap, perhaps now?
>
> Think vendor kernel. There we want to run on ancient pre-ACPI boxes,
> and super duper new box with borken/non-existant legacy tables.
> So just keep in mind that compiling both into the kernel is a
> must have
> requirement.

Oh. OK. Yes. No disagreement there.

-- Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.048 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site